One swiss member asked a concern we get all the time: Do we actually need a second photographer? According to her, both her future hubby and the photographer believe it is fine to not include exactly what people in the market call a "second shooter," but she's a little less persuaded. "I personally wish to have 2 professional photographers since we are preparing at 2 different locations and I wish to make sure that we can get images of everyone preparing," the bride shares. "Oh, and we invited around 350 people, I believe a second professional photographer is a must.".. http://bestofweddingphotography.com/ is a great source for infos too.
We totally concur. In a lot of cases, you'll desire a 2nd photographer for a great deal of useful factors, and not just the two laid out above (getting ready in 2 separate places and a a great deal of guests). There's also the logistics of ways to shoot the walk down the aisle. Believe about it: You'll want your walk and your future husband's reaction to it, your vows and your moms and dads' responses. You understand-- multiple things happen all at once at weddings and they're all worth capturing, from getting ready to the ceremony, cocktail hour and reception.
In our opinion, a 2nd shooter is definitely worth it, even with a smaller sized number of guests. Obviously there are a few ways to "hack" the timeline so that a second shooter is a little less required. For circumstances, collaborate the getting prepared time so that bridesmaids and the bride are preparing initially, then groomsmen, so that one photographer can catch both scenarios. Locate a lot more info about wedding celebration photography in genève on that blog post
If your budget plan is the factor you want to ditch the second shooter, consider cutting down the amount of time you need your professional photographer (lots of photographers comprehend this element, and will take all the required images from the reception right away so you can get on with the celebration).
